<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27047</link>
    <description>The court held that the sale of import entitlements by an exporter should be treated as business profits, following the decision of the Bombay High Court. The court rejected the argument for a reference and upheld the treatment of the sale proceeds as revenue, not capital receipt. The sale of import licenses without actual importation was deemed to be part of the business profits, emphasizing that exploiting entitlements through sale does not change the nature of the receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27047</link>
      <description>The court held that the sale of import entitlements by an exporter should be treated as business profits, following the decision of the Bombay High Court. The court rejected the argument for a reference and upheld the treatment of the sale proceeds as revenue, not capital receipt. The sale of import licenses without actual importation was deemed to be part of the business profits, emphasizing that exploiting entitlements through sale does not change the nature of the receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>