<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 207 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414426</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondents to dispose of the hazardous goods within three months, with both parties retaining the right to seek Court intervention if needed. The petitioner agreed to forgo certain claims regarding storage charges. The judgment was concluded without prejudice to either party, addressing issues of misdeclaration, liability for penalties under the Customs Act, and proper handling of hazardous goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 07:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 207 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414426</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondents to dispose of the hazardous goods within three months, with both parties retaining the right to seek Court intervention if needed. The petitioner agreed to forgo certain claims regarding storage charges. The judgment was concluded without prejudice to either party, addressing issues of misdeclaration, liability for penalties under the Customs Act, and proper handling of hazardous goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>