<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 201 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414420</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal based on compliance with the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) and bond cancellation, which indicated fulfillment of export obligations. Despite the unavailability of the test report for one shipping bill, the tribunal held that no further duty demand was warranted, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appeal with any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 07:00:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 201 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414420</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal based on compliance with the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) and bond cancellation, which indicated fulfillment of export obligations. Despite the unavailability of the test report for one shipping bill, the tribunal held that no further duty demand was warranted, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appeal with any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>