<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 177 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414396</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order-in-original assessing service tax dues, emphasizing that the availability of a statutory appellate remedy does not always bar the jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument of a breach of natural justice due to the Commissioner&#039;s failure to provide reasons for not applying cited case laws, the Court held that the omission did not warrant interference through a writ petition when a statutory remedy of appeal existed. The Court highlighted the importance of natural justice in administrative actions but concluded that the order did not violate such principles, allowing the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 177 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414396</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order-in-original assessing service tax dues, emphasizing that the availability of a statutory appellate remedy does not always bar the jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226. Despite the petitioner&#039;s argument of a breach of natural justice due to the Commissioner&#039;s failure to provide reasons for not applying cited case laws, the Court held that the omission did not warrant interference through a writ petition when a statutory remedy of appeal existed. The Court highlighted the importance of natural justice in administrative actions but concluded that the order did not violate such principles, allowing the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>