<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 176 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414395</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; failed in light of the larger bench&#039;s decision in Kafila Hospitality &amp;amp; Travels Pvt Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 176 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414395</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; failed in light of the larger bench&#039;s decision in Kafila Hospitality &amp;amp; Travels Pvt Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>