https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414387 The High Court intervened to protect the petitioners' interests in a case involving the classification of stainless steel wires for tax assessment, validity of a recovery notice issued during pending legal proceedings, and the absence of a Presiding Officer in the Tribunal affecting the petitioners' application for stay. The Court directed the second respondent not to pursue coercive recovery until a new Presiding Officer is appointed, granting the petitioners an additional two weeks for their matter to be addressed. The stay granted was due to the exceptional circumstance of the Tribunal's absence and would not influence the Tribunal's future decision on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:59:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414387 The High Court intervened to protect the petitioners' interests in a case involving the classification of stainless steel wires for tax assessment, validity of a recovery notice issued during pending legal proceedings, and the absence of a Presiding Officer in the Tribunal affecting the petitioners' application for stay. The Court directed the second respondent not to pursue coercive recovery until a new Presiding Officer is appointed, granting the petitioners an additional two weeks for their matter to be addressed. The stay granted was due to the exceptional circumstance of the Tribunal's absence and would not influence the Tribunal's future decision on the case's merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414387