<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 163 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414382</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of conviction and sentence as the complaint was filed prematurely under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court allowed the criminal revision petition, discharged the bailors of liabilities, and directed the complainant to file a fresh complaint with sufficient cause for delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 163 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414382</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of conviction and sentence as the complaint was filed prematurely under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court allowed the criminal revision petition, discharged the bailors of liabilities, and directed the complainant to file a fresh complaint with sufficient cause for delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>