<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 161 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414380</link>
    <description>Delhi HC declined regular bail in a multi-victim economic offence involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from a large real estate fraud. Although the investigation was complete, the court treated the gravity of the accusations, the accused&#039;s lack of cooperation, the shifting of the company&#039;s registered office, prior evasion of arrest, and the risk of influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence as decisive. Completion of investigation alone was insufficient to justify release where credible apprehension of absconding and interference with the trial remained. Regular bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 161 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414380</link>
      <description>Delhi HC declined regular bail in a multi-victim economic offence involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from a large real estate fraud. Although the investigation was complete, the court treated the gravity of the accusations, the accused&#039;s lack of cooperation, the shifting of the company&#039;s registered office, prior evasion of arrest, and the risk of influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence as decisive. Completion of investigation alone was insufficient to justify release where credible apprehension of absconding and interference with the trial remained. Regular bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>