<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 34 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27039</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed whether property purchased in the name of minor sons was benami and if the income could be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands. It emphasized the importance of evidence in determining the nature of the transaction. The Court rephrased the question for reference to the Court, directing the Tribunal to seek the Court&#039;s opinion. Both applications were allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:38:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 34 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27039</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed whether property purchased in the name of minor sons was benami and if the income could be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands. It emphasized the importance of evidence in determining the nature of the transaction. The Court rephrased the question for reference to the Court, directing the Tribunal to seek the Court&#039;s opinion. Both applications were allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>