<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1917 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298488</link>
    <description>A contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order was closed after the underlying writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner. The court therefore treated the contempt proceedings as no longer requiring adjudication and disposed of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1917 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298488</link>
      <description>A contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order was closed after the underlying writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner. The court therefore treated the contempt proceedings as no longer requiring adjudication and disposed of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>