https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298486 The Special Judge, PMLA, rejected the extension of custody remand for the respondent, citing insufficient grounds such as lack of cooperation in the investigation and vague references to new evidence. The court found that the reasons presented did not warrant further custody, noting that the time already spent in custody was deemed adequate for interrogation. The court emphasized that lack of cooperation and the absence of other accused persons were not valid reasons for extending custody, ultimately dismissing the petition due to the inadequacy of the grounds provided. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298486 The Special Judge, PMLA, rejected the extension of custody remand for the respondent, citing insufficient grounds such as lack of cooperation in the investigation and vague references to new evidence. The court found that the reasons presented did not warrant further custody, noting that the time already spent in custody was deemed adequate for interrogation. The court emphasized that lack of cooperation and the absence of other accused persons were not valid reasons for extending custody, ultimately dismissing the petition due to the inadequacy of the grounds provided. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298486