https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298485 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision, affirming the accused's conviction and sentence of one year of simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 5,000, and compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 to the complainant. The accused's revision petition was dismissed as the complainant proved her financial capacity and the validity of the loan transaction, while the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298485 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision, affirming the accused's conviction and sentence of one year of simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 5,000, and compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 to the complainant. The accused's revision petition was dismissed as the complainant proved her financial capacity and the validity of the loan transaction, while the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298485