<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1578 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298501</link>
    <description>Review of an order concerning a Look Out Circular was declined because the later office memorandum did not change the governing test: action on economic interests of India requires exceptional circumstances showing real harm to the national economy or public interest, not an ordinary commercial loan default. Since recovery proceedings and execution remedies were already available to the bank, LOCs could not be used as a substitute for normal debt recovery. On the contempt issue, the court treated contempt as an exceptional remedy, accepted the immigration authorities&#039; explanation for implementation difficulty, and found no basis for coercive action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1578 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298501</link>
      <description>Review of an order concerning a Look Out Circular was declined because the later office memorandum did not change the governing test: action on economic interests of India requires exceptional circumstances showing real harm to the national economy or public interest, not an ordinary commercial loan default. Since recovery proceedings and execution remedies were already available to the bank, LOCs could not be used as a substitute for normal debt recovery. On the contempt issue, the court treated contempt as an exceptional remedy, accepted the immigration authorities&#039; explanation for implementation difficulty, and found no basis for coercive action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>