https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298492 The court upheld the genuineness of the Will dated 5th December 2000, favoring Defendant No. 1. As a result, the Plaintiffs were denied the reliefs claimed in the suit. The court found the Plaintiffs had concealed material facts, including another purported Will, leading to a dismissal of their claims. The suit was not barred by res judicata, and the valuation and limitation issues were decided against the Plaintiffs. Ultimately, the Plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their claims for ownership, partition, and injunction for the properties, leading to the dismissal of the suit without costs awarded. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298492 The court upheld the genuineness of the Will dated 5th December 2000, favoring Defendant No. 1. As a result, the Plaintiffs were denied the reliefs claimed in the suit. The court found the Plaintiffs had concealed material facts, including another purported Will, leading to a dismissal of their claims. The suit was not barred by res judicata, and the valuation and limitation issues were decided against the Plaintiffs. Ultimately, the Plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their claims for ownership, partition, and injunction for the properties, leading to the dismissal of the suit without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298492