<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 883 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298512</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking to scrap a Commission of Inquiry and establish a Special Investigation Team. The Petitioner alleged bias and conflict of interest against the Commission members based on newspaper reports. The Court emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to prove bias, noting that newspaper reports alone lack evidentiary value. Additionally, the Court highlighted the non-binding nature of Inquiry Commission findings and rejected the Petitioner&#039;s repeated applications as unnecessary. The Court upheld the integrity of the inquiry process, ultimately finding the petition lacking merit and emphasizing the importance of substantiated bias allegations in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 883 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298512</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking to scrap a Commission of Inquiry and establish a Special Investigation Team. The Petitioner alleged bias and conflict of interest against the Commission members based on newspaper reports. The Court emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to prove bias, noting that newspaper reports alone lack evidentiary value. Additionally, the Court highlighted the non-binding nature of Inquiry Commission findings and rejected the Petitioner&#039;s repeated applications as unnecessary. The Court upheld the integrity of the inquiry process, ultimately finding the petition lacking merit and emphasizing the importance of substantiated bias allegations in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>