<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2815 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298509</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions seeking transfer of investigation to an independent agency, citing lack of merit in allegations against the SIT and rejecting the need for a new investigation team. The court criticized the petitioner&#039;s conduct, noting delays in disclosure and interactions raising doubts about credibility. Allegations of hacking and tampering with emails were refuted, with the court emphasizing the State Police&#039;s capability for a fair investigation. Requests for a new SIT were denied, and allegations of criminal contempt were found baseless due to lack of evidence and being time-barred. The court directed proceedings to continue as per law, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 11:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2815 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298509</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions seeking transfer of investigation to an independent agency, citing lack of merit in allegations against the SIT and rejecting the need for a new investigation team. The court criticized the petitioner&#039;s conduct, noting delays in disclosure and interactions raising doubts about credibility. Allegations of hacking and tampering with emails were refuted, with the court emphasizing the State Police&#039;s capability for a fair investigation. Requests for a new SIT were denied, and allegations of criminal contempt were found baseless due to lack of evidence and being time-barred. The court directed proceedings to continue as per law, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>