<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court to Set Aside Show-Cause Notice on Transitional Credit Due to Jurisdictional Errors in CGST Act Section 140.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60377</link>
    <description>Validity of Show cause notice - jurisdiction - Inadmissible transitional credit - Education Cess (E Cess) - Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess (SHE Cess) - Krishi Kalyan Cess (KK Cess) - Perusal of the impugned show-cause notice would reveal assumption of jurisdiction by the respondent no.3 based on introduction of Explanation 3 to Section 140 of the CGST Act read with Explanations 1 and 2 thereof without showing application of mind as to whether the amended Explanations 1 and 2 have been made operational or not as well as whether Explanation 3 would at all apply to sub-section (1) of Section 140 of the CGST Act. - The present case is one where the impugned show-cause notice suffers from an error going to the root of the jurisdiction of the respondent no.3 in assuming jurisdiction and is, accordingly, indefensible and liable to be set aside - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:32:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court to Set Aside Show-Cause Notice on Transitional Credit Due to Jurisdictional Errors in CGST Act Section 140.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60377</link>
      <description>Validity of Show cause notice - jurisdiction - Inadmissible transitional credit - Education Cess (E Cess) - Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess (SHE Cess) - Krishi Kalyan Cess (KK Cess) - Perusal of the impugned show-cause notice would reveal assumption of jurisdiction by the respondent no.3 based on introduction of Explanation 3 to Section 140 of the CGST Act read with Explanations 1 and 2 thereof without showing application of mind as to whether the amended Explanations 1 and 2 have been made operational or not as well as whether Explanation 3 would at all apply to sub-section (1) of Section 140 of the CGST Act. - The present case is one where the impugned show-cause notice suffers from an error going to the root of the jurisdiction of the respondent no.3 in assuming jurisdiction and is, accordingly, indefensible and liable to be set aside - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:32:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>