<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 152 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414371</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 2nd respondent to grant the IGST refund of Rs. 14,78,99,959/- and the 4th respondent to grant the All Industry Drawback and Brand Rate Drawback if the claims were in accordance with the law. The court criticized the respondents for unjustifiably withholding the refunds and drawbacks despite completed verifications, emphasizing the importance of timely processing to support exports and statutory compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 152 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414371</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 2nd respondent to grant the IGST refund of Rs. 14,78,99,959/- and the 4th respondent to grant the All Industry Drawback and Brand Rate Drawback if the claims were in accordance with the law. The court criticized the respondents for unjustifiably withholding the refunds and drawbacks despite completed verifications, emphasizing the importance of timely processing to support exports and statutory compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>