<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision was based on the lack of specificity in the penalty notice and assessment order, emphasizing the importance of a specific charge in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and highlighted the deficiency in the notice, ultimately leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision was based on the lack of specificity in the penalty notice and assessment order, emphasizing the importance of a specific charge in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and highlighted the deficiency in the notice, ultimately leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>