<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 138 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to permit the deduction of educational Cess as per the revised income computation. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the provision for leave encashment based on actuarial valuation, citing a Supreme Court decision that the deduction for leave encashment liability is governed by prospective legislation. The order was issued on 26th October 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 138 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to permit the deduction of educational Cess as per the revised income computation. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the provision for leave encashment based on actuarial valuation, citing a Supreme Court decision that the deduction for leave encashment liability is governed by prospective legislation. The order was issued on 26th October 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>