<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 134 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reverse additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding the assessee adequately explained the source of share application money. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding jurisdiction under Section 153A, stating that additions in concluded assessments require incriminating material from the search. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 134 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reverse additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding the assessee adequately explained the source of share application money. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding jurisdiction under Section 153A, stating that additions in concluded assessments require incriminating material from the search. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>