<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 132 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment proceedings, leading to the conclusion that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was considered invalid, and the revision order was overturned. The appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 132 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment proceedings, leading to the conclusion that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was considered invalid, and the revision order was overturned. The appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>