<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 122 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414341</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 payable to respondent No.2 by 25.10.2021. The petitioners were directed to appear before the Whole Time Member (WTM) on the same date without further notice, who would then hear them and issue orders as per the law. The court found no necessity to refer to the judgments cited by both parties as the petitioners&#039; contentions were considered premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 122 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414341</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 payable to respondent No.2 by 25.10.2021. The petitioners were directed to appear before the Whole Time Member (WTM) on the same date without further notice, who would then hear them and issue orders as per the law. The court found no necessity to refer to the judgments cited by both parties as the petitioners&#039; contentions were considered premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>