<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 112 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414331</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that notifications under the Central Excise Act become effective from their publication date, not the date of issue, allowing the appellant&#039;s refund claim. The tribunal remanded the case to address the principle of unjust enrichment as the appellant had not passed on the increased duty burden to buyers. The tribunal emphasized the significance of considering unjust enrichment in excise duty cases and set aside the previous order for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 112 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414331</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that notifications under the Central Excise Act become effective from their publication date, not the date of issue, allowing the appellant&#039;s refund claim. The tribunal remanded the case to address the principle of unjust enrichment as the appellant had not passed on the increased duty burden to buyers. The tribunal emphasized the significance of considering unjust enrichment in excise duty cases and set aside the previous order for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>