<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</link>
    <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies where excisable goods are cleared partly on payment of duty and partly under exemption using common inputs. The obligation under Rule 6(3)(a) depends on the nature of the clearances, not on whether the exempted and dutiable clearances relate to two different goods. On that basis, payment equal to 10% of the value of the exempted clearances was held to be correctly made, and refund of the amount was not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</link>
      <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies where excisable goods are cleared partly on payment of duty and partly under exemption using common inputs. The obligation under Rule 6(3)(a) depends on the nature of the clearances, not on whether the exempted and dutiable clearances relate to two different goods. On that basis, payment equal to 10% of the value of the exempted clearances was held to be correctly made, and refund of the amount was not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>