<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the denial of the refund under the Cenvat Credit Rules. It held that Rule 6(3) applies when goods are cleared both on payment of duty and under exemption, with common inputs used. Since the goods were cleared in both ways to the research institute, Rule 6(3)(a) was deemed applicable. The appellant&#039;s payment of 10% was found to be in compliance with the rule, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the denial of the refund under the Cenvat Credit Rules. It held that Rule 6(3) applies when goods are cleared both on payment of duty and under exemption, with common inputs used. Since the goods were cleared in both ways to the research institute, Rule 6(3)(a) was deemed applicable. The appellant&#039;s payment of 10% was found to be in compliance with the rule, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>