https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298464 The appellate tribunal did not decide the merits of the interlocutory order maintaining status quo over the composition of the company's Board of Directors. By common concession, it instead requested the Tribunal to accord priority to the main Company Petition and all connected interlocutory applications, and to endeavour expeditious disposal, preferably within two months. A copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the Tribunal. The effect was purely procedural, focusing on accelerated hearing rather than substantive adjudication of interim relief. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:01:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298464 The appellate tribunal did not decide the merits of the interlocutory order maintaining status quo over the composition of the company's Board of Directors. By common concession, it instead requested the Tribunal to accord priority to the main Company Petition and all connected interlocutory applications, and to endeavour expeditious disposal, preferably within two months. A copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the Tribunal. The effect was purely procedural, focusing on accelerated hearing rather than substantive adjudication of interim relief. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298464