<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1174 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298468</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the show-cause notices dated October 20, 2016, and August 20, 2019, due to the significant delays of four to six years in issuing the notice and seven to nine years in holding the hearing. The Court relied on precedents indicating that delays of this magnitude in SEBI actions were unsustainable, deciding it would not be beneficial to refer the petitioner back to SEBI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1174 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298468</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the show-cause notices dated October 20, 2016, and August 20, 2019, due to the significant delays of four to six years in issuing the notice and seven to nine years in holding the hearing. The Court relied on precedents indicating that delays of this magnitude in SEBI actions were unsustainable, deciding it would not be beneficial to refer the petitioner back to SEBI.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>