<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 319 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298452</link>
    <description>Exceptional power to dispense with a disciplinary inquiry under Rule 14(2) requires material supporting the foundational jurisdictional fact that an inquiry was not reasonably practicable; absent such material, the dismissal is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. The Court further moulded relief in view of the long continuation of the dismissals and the absence of a valid merits-based justification, directing reinstatement, limited monetary compensation, and notional continuity only for pensionary purposes, while denying promotional benefits. The relief was tailored to balance fairness to both sides and no order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 319 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298452</link>
      <description>Exceptional power to dispense with a disciplinary inquiry under Rule 14(2) requires material supporting the foundational jurisdictional fact that an inquiry was not reasonably practicable; absent such material, the dismissal is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. The Court further moulded relief in view of the long continuation of the dismissals and the absence of a valid merits-based justification, directing reinstatement, limited monetary compensation, and notional continuity only for pensionary purposes, while denying promotional benefits. The relief was tailored to balance fairness to both sides and no order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>