<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 818 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298451</link>
    <description>A writ petition alleging acquisition of wealth disproportionate to known sources of income was supported by extensive documentary material, including tax returns, assessment records, charts and photographs. Because the allegations raised disputed questions about acquisition, valuation and source of funds, the SC noted that they could not be effectively resolved on the writ record and required scrutiny by an independent investigating agency with technical assistance. The political context of the allegations did not justify rejection at the threshold. A preliminary CBI enquiry was therefore directed in public interest, with further action to depend on the outcome of that enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 818 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298451</link>
      <description>A writ petition alleging acquisition of wealth disproportionate to known sources of income was supported by extensive documentary material, including tax returns, assessment records, charts and photographs. Because the allegations raised disputed questions about acquisition, valuation and source of funds, the SC noted that they could not be effectively resolved on the writ record and required scrutiny by an independent investigating agency with technical assistance. The political context of the allegations did not justify rejection at the threshold. A preliminary CBI enquiry was therefore directed in public interest, with further action to depend on the outcome of that enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>