<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 107 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414326</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order declaring the transfer of immovable property void under Section 281 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; entitlement to protection as bona fide purchasers for adequate consideration. The court highlighted procedural lapses, lack of authority of the Tax Recovery Officer to void transfers, and closed pending petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 107 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414326</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order declaring the transfer of immovable property void under Section 281 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; entitlement to protection as bona fide purchasers for adequate consideration. The court highlighted procedural lapses, lack of authority of the Tax Recovery Officer to void transfers, and closed pending petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>