<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 76 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow expenses claimed by a company despite no business activity during the assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, challenging the deletion of the disallowance, was dismissed as the expenses were deemed necessary for maintaining the company&#039;s status, as per legal precedents. The Tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and concluded that the Revenue&#039;s arguments lacked specificity, affirming the ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 76 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow expenses claimed by a company despite no business activity during the assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, challenging the deletion of the disallowance, was dismissed as the expenses were deemed necessary for maintaining the company&#039;s status, as per legal precedents. The Tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and concluded that the Revenue&#039;s arguments lacked specificity, affirming the ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>