<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 69 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant to entities outside India qualified as export of services under Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The recipients were deemed independent entities and not &quot;other establishments&quot; of the appellant, following a precedent set by a High Court decision. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was dismissed, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed on 26.10.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 69 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant to entities outside India qualified as export of services under Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The recipients were deemed independent entities and not &quot;other establishments&quot; of the appellant, following a precedent set by a High Court decision. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was dismissed, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed on 26.10.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>