https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298441 The Tribunal found a prima facie case due to the absence of an explanatory statement in the special notice for the Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) seeking the removal of the petitioner as a director. However, it decided not to stay the EOGM proceedings but imposed conditions, including requiring permission for the enforcement of any resolution passed and prompt submission of the resolution to the Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to serve the court order to the respondents and adhere to specified deadlines for further proceedings. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:26:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298441 The Tribunal found a prima facie case due to the absence of an explanatory statement in the special notice for the Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) seeking the removal of the petitioner as a director. However, it decided not to stay the EOGM proceedings but imposed conditions, including requiring permission for the enforcement of any resolution passed and prompt submission of the resolution to the Tribunal. The petitioner was directed to serve the court order to the respondents and adhere to specified deadlines for further proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298441