<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1552 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order passed under Section 263, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with the Tribunal finding that the Principal CIT had overstepped his jurisdiction by substituting his opinion for that of the AO. The order was pronounced in open court on 26/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1552 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order passed under Section 263, concluding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with the Tribunal finding that the Principal CIT had overstepped his jurisdiction by substituting his opinion for that of the AO. The order was pronounced in open court on 26/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>