<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1421 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298437</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order in ITA No. 246/Hyd/2015 was annulled due to mistakes apparent from the record, including improper initiation of proceedings u/s. 147. The ITAT clarified that findings in other cases were observations, not directions, leading to the annulment of the assessment order. Assessment proceedings were deemed null and void due to procedural irregularities. The application for amending the ITAT order based on mistakes was dismissed, emphasizing the need to challenge decisions through higher forums. The ITAT affirmed its decision without cost implications, highlighting limitations on its own order review jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1421 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298437</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order in ITA No. 246/Hyd/2015 was annulled due to mistakes apparent from the record, including improper initiation of proceedings u/s. 147. The ITAT clarified that findings in other cases were observations, not directions, leading to the annulment of the assessment order. Assessment proceedings were deemed null and void due to procedural irregularities. The application for amending the ITAT order based on mistakes was dismissed, emphasizing the need to challenge decisions through higher forums. The ITAT affirmed its decision without cost implications, highlighting limitations on its own order review jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>