https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298445 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's orders granting bail to two Accused persons in a criminal case despite their involvement in the incident and criminal history. The Court considered the seriousness of the charges, pending cases, and witness statements but found no errors in the High Court's exercise of discretion. Comparisons with previous cases emphasized the need for a prima facie view of evidence and absence of non-application of mind to interfere with bail orders. The appeals challenging the bail orders were dismissed, affirming the grant of bail to the Accused individuals. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298445 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's orders granting bail to two Accused persons in a criminal case despite their involvement in the incident and criminal history. The Court considered the seriousness of the charges, pending cases, and witness statements but found no errors in the High Court's exercise of discretion. Comparisons with previous cases emphasized the need for a prima facie view of evidence and absence of non-application of mind to interfere with bail orders. The appeals challenging the bail orders were dismissed, affirming the grant of bail to the Accused individuals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298445