<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DCIT&#039;s Jurisdiction Invalid: Failed to Issue Section 143(2) Notice Timely for 2015-16 Assessment Year, Procedural Flaw Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60336</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly transferred the file to the DCIT, Circle-4, Guwahati, when the DCIT issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act and did not issue notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within the time limit prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16. We note that the DCIT by assuming the jurisdiction after the time prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act notice became coarum non judice after the limitation prescribed by the statute was crossed by him. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:11:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DCIT&#039;s Jurisdiction Invalid: Failed to Issue Section 143(2) Notice Timely for 2015-16 Assessment Year, Procedural Flaw Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60336</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly transferred the file to the DCIT, Circle-4, Guwahati, when the DCIT issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act and did not issue notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within the time limit prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16. We note that the DCIT by assuming the jurisdiction after the time prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act notice became coarum non judice after the limitation prescribed by the statute was crossed by him. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:11:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>