<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>exclusive show room been treated as related party transaction</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117608</link>
    <description>Related party characterisation under GST can prompt Rule 28 valuation adjustments where a brand owner supplies promotional goods to an exclusive third party showroom operating under brand SOPs. The department may deny ITC on promotional free supplies and demand re valuation to open market value, but contractual terms and the applicant specific nature of AARs are material to rebutting related party treatment; circulars cannot override the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:59:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>exclusive show room been treated as related party transaction</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117608</link>
      <description>Related party characterisation under GST can prompt Rule 28 valuation adjustments where a brand owner supplies promotional goods to an exclusive third party showroom operating under brand SOPs. The department may deny ITC on promotional free supplies and demand re valuation to open market value, but contractual terms and the applicant specific nature of AARs are material to rebutting related party treatment; circulars cannot override the statute.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:59:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>