https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414283 The High Court quashed the order dated 29.03.2018 under Section 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition and directing the refund of any deposited amount. The court also rejected the appeal under Section 107 of the UPGST Act on the ground of limitation, quashing the order dated 03.09.2020 and ordering the refund within one month. Additionally, the court overturned the penalty for transporting goods without an e-way bill-01 under the UPGST Act, directing the refund of any deposited amount by the petitioner. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Nov 2021 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414283 The High Court quashed the order dated 29.03.2018 under Section 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition and directing the refund of any deposited amount. The court also rejected the appeal under Section 107 of the UPGST Act on the ground of limitation, quashing the order dated 03.09.2020 and ordering the refund within one month. Additionally, the court overturned the penalty for transporting goods without an e-way bill-01 under the UPGST Act, directing the refund of any deposited amount by the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414283