https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414281 The court set aside the cancellation order of registration under the UPGST Act, 2017, emphasizing the necessity of proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The cancellation was deemed ex-parte due to technical issues and lack of clear notice service. The court attributed the delay in challenging the order to the State and pandemic impact, remitting the matter for a fresh decision. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice, and the authority was instructed to conduct a hearing within a specified period. The writ petition was allowed without costs. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:11:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414281 The court set aside the cancellation order of registration under the UPGST Act, 2017, emphasizing the necessity of proper notice and opportunity to be heard. The cancellation was deemed ex-parte due to technical issues and lack of clear notice service. The court attributed the delay in challenging the order to the State and pandemic impact, remitting the matter for a fresh decision. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice, and the authority was instructed to conduct a hearing within a specified period. The writ petition was allowed without costs. Case-Laws GST Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414281