<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414274</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Single Bench, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue based on a change of opinion without new material. The Court emphasized the necessity of fresh tangible material to justify reassessment, highlighting the importance of jurisdictional facts for valid reassessment. The Writ Appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Bench&#039;s ruling and closing the related Miscellaneous Petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414274</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Single Bench, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue based on a change of opinion without new material. The Court emphasized the necessity of fresh tangible material to justify reassessment, highlighting the importance of jurisdictional facts for valid reassessment. The Writ Appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Bench&#039;s ruling and closing the related Miscellaneous Petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>