<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 17 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s exercise of revisionary powers post the withdrawal of such powers was invalid. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be sustained and, therefore, set it aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 17 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner&#039;s exercise of revisionary powers post the withdrawal of such powers was invalid. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be sustained and, therefore, set it aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>