<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 11 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414230</link>
    <description>CESTAT (Hyderabad) allowed the appeal, holding that under amended Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (effective 01.04.2011) input service includes services used in relation to listed activities (e.g., sales promotion, procurement, auditing) even without direct nexus to manufacture. Air travel agency services used by the manufacturer&#039;s officials for business travel related to sales promotion, procurement, audits, vendor inspection and review qualify as input services and are eligible for CENVAT credit. The tribunal found the services were for corporate/business purposes, not personal use, and faulted the denial of credit by the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 11 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414230</link>
      <description>CESTAT (Hyderabad) allowed the appeal, holding that under amended Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (effective 01.04.2011) input service includes services used in relation to listed activities (e.g., sales promotion, procurement, auditing) even without direct nexus to manufacture. Air travel agency services used by the manufacturer&#039;s officials for business travel related to sales promotion, procurement, audits, vendor inspection and review qualify as input services and are eligible for CENVAT credit. The tribunal found the services were for corporate/business purposes, not personal use, and faulted the denial of credit by the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>