<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1870 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298409</link>
    <description>The substituted Section 84 of the Finance Act, 2009 withdrew the jurisdictional Commissioner&#039;s revisionary power with effect from 19-8-2009. An order-in-revision passed on 26-4-2010 was therefore made after the statutory power had ceased to exist, so the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the matter. The revision order was treated as without authority and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1870 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298409</link>
      <description>The substituted Section 84 of the Finance Act, 2009 withdrew the jurisdictional Commissioner&#039;s revisionary power with effect from 19-8-2009. An order-in-revision passed on 26-4-2010 was therefore made after the statutory power had ceased to exist, so the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the matter. The revision order was treated as without authority and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>