https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298418 The Tribunal declined to entertain separate Interim Applications seeking various reliefs against the Respondents in the main Company Petition, as the main Petition already covered the prayers made in the Interim Applications. It granted liberty to the Applicants to seek appropriate interim orders as requested in the main Petition on the next hearing date after the Respondents filed their replies. The Tribunal emphasized the procedural aspects of filing Interim Applications and the importance of addressing interim reliefs within the main Petition. It disposed of the seven Interim Applications, allowing the Applicants to urge the Tribunal for appropriate interim orders during the next hearing. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:07:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298418 The Tribunal declined to entertain separate Interim Applications seeking various reliefs against the Respondents in the main Company Petition, as the main Petition already covered the prayers made in the Interim Applications. It granted liberty to the Applicants to seek appropriate interim orders as requested in the main Petition on the next hearing date after the Respondents filed their replies. The Tribunal emphasized the procedural aspects of filing Interim Applications and the importance of addressing interim reliefs within the main Petition. It disposed of the seven Interim Applications, allowing the Applicants to urge the Tribunal for appropriate interim orders during the next hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298418