<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1502 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298423</link>
    <description>The Court found the respondent unjustified in prematurely completing assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act due to procedural irregularities. Despite this, the assessment orders were not set aside but directed to be treated as show cause notices. The petitioner was instructed to submit objections upon receiving requested documents, and the respondent was ordered to redo assessments within 15 days of objections, ensuring compliance with legal procedures and natural justice principles. Coercive tax recovery action was prohibited until fresh assessment orders were issued. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 07:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1502 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298423</link>
      <description>The Court found the respondent unjustified in prematurely completing assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act due to procedural irregularities. Despite this, the assessment orders were not set aside but directed to be treated as show cause notices. The petitioner was instructed to submit objections upon receiving requested documents, and the respondent was ordered to redo assessments within 15 days of objections, ensuring compliance with legal procedures and natural justice principles. Coercive tax recovery action was prohibited until fresh assessment orders were issued. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>