<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1236 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, directing the Adjudicating Authority to amend the Bill of Entry under Section 154 and process the refund as per the directions in a previous case. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant&#039;s request for amendment was valid and should have been considered initially, avoiding delay and subsequent legal proceedings. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for appropriate action in line with the specified judicial directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1236 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, directing the Adjudicating Authority to amend the Bill of Entry under Section 154 and process the refund as per the directions in a previous case. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant&#039;s request for amendment was valid and should have been considered initially, avoiding delay and subsequent legal proceedings. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for appropriate action in line with the specified judicial directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>