<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for proper verification before granting relief. It partially allowed the appeal, directing the Income-tax Officer to verify facts and finalize the assessment accordingly. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Income-tax Officer for further enquiry, including a fresh consideration of the weighted deduction claim under section 35B(1)(b)(iii). The decision supported the cancellation of disallowance of weighted deduction and provided a fresh period of limitation for reevaluation. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for proper verification before granting relief. It partially allowed the appeal, directing the Income-tax Officer to verify facts and finalize the assessment accordingly. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Income-tax Officer for further enquiry, including a fresh consideration of the weighted deduction claim under section 35B(1)(b)(iii). The decision supported the cancellation of disallowance of weighted deduction and provided a fresh period of limitation for reevaluation. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>