https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298400 The High Court allowed the writ petition, relying on the Supreme Court's judgment, and quashed the orders denying rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The petitioner was declared entitled to the rebate, emphasizing the binding nature of legal precedents and the hierarchy of courts in ensuring consistent application of established legal principles. This case underscores the importance of judicial review in upholding rights and ensuring administrative decisions align with the law. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:05:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298400 The High Court allowed the writ petition, relying on the Supreme Court's judgment, and quashed the orders denying rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The petitioner was declared entitled to the rebate, emphasizing the binding nature of legal precedents and the hierarchy of courts in ensuring consistent application of established legal principles. This case underscores the importance of judicial review in upholding rights and ensuring administrative decisions align with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298400