https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298399 Rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not be denied merely because it was claimed a second time. The revisional authority's view was rejected because the issue had already been settled by the Supreme Court's interpretation of Rule 18, leaving no scope for reconsideration. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to the rebate, and the objection based on repeat claim failed. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:05:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298399 Rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not be denied merely because it was claimed a second time. The revisional authority's view was rejected because the issue had already been settled by the Supreme Court's interpretation of Rule 18, leaving no scope for reconsideration. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to the rebate, and the objection based on repeat claim failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298399